Thursday, March 31, 2016

Content Outline

This blog outlines every section for project 3. It was a great way for me to gather my evidence and organize all of my information. I decided to make a video essay so this outline will also be helpful for writing a script.

An opening section:
  • I am going to begin my video essay by explaining the women’s soccer team filing a report demanding equal pay as the men’s soccer team. I will also introduce myself and state my credibility.
At least 3 main body sections (more’s fine):
  • My first body section will discuss the logos, including statistics and facts, about how much less the women’s soccer team is getting paid to men.
  • My second body section is going to move on to how women in general and in many other jobs are getting paid less than men and why that is not fair.
  • My third paragraph will explain what is causing this issue and what can be done to solve it.
A closing section:
  • My closing section will appeal to my readers emotionally. I am going to reiterate what I talked about in the opening section. I will also share a personal story and why I am passionate about women’s rights and equality.
Main idea for each section:
  • The opening section is going to captivate my audience and make them interested in my topic. I am going to appeal to them emotionally.
  • My first body section is going to appeal to them by using logos. It is going to go into further explanation about the women’s soccer team and give specific facts.
  • My second body section is, again, going to appeal to my viewers by using logos. However, instead of specifically discussing women’s soccer, I am going to inform my audience of the inequality of pay in all workplaces. I will also bring up counter arguments and defend my side.
  • In my third body section, I will be explaining the history of gender pay discrimination and how far we’ve come. I will also talk about how much more needs to change, and what we can do to solve the problem.
  • My conclusion will again appeal to my viewers emotionally and also give my information credibility by including my works cited.
Major pieces of evidence for each body section (there should be at least 2 for each):

Section #1:
  • I am going to give the statistics of how much less the women’s soccer team is getting paid than the men’s national soccer team.
  • I am also going to use quotes from the players as evidence.
Section #2:
  • I am going to give the statistics of how much women are payed compared to men in the general workplace.
  • I am also going to use evidence that the women are indeed doing the same amount of work as the men.
Section #3:
  • I will give the numbers of what the pay gap used to be compared to now.
  • I will also use quotes about what being are saying countering this argument and what we can do to solve it.
Summary of what the evidence proves (for each piece of evidence):
  1. This proves that the women are indeed getting payed significantly less than the men’s national soccer team.
  2. This provides primary evidence to support claims.
  3. The third piece of evidence, again, proves how much less women are getting paid than men in the workplace.
  4. This proves that the women deserve equal pay.
  5. This proves how far we have come and that it is possible to keep fighting to get complete equal pay between genders.
  6. This addresses the counter arguments and gives evidence stating why they are wrong.
Summary of why that’s important (for each piece of evidence):
  1. This is important because it provides logos to support my statement.
  2. The quotes are important because they make it more real and personal to the audience, especially since they are from the women on the national team themselves.
  3. Again, this is important because it appeals to my viewers logical side.
  4. This is important because it proves how the unequal pay is unfair because men and women do they same amount of work, appealing to the emotional side of my viewers.
  5. This piece of evidence establishes credibility and proves to my viewers change is possible.
  6. The last piece of evidence is important because it brings up counter arguments. It is important to bring them up, yet give facts and quotes as to why those counter arguments are wrong.
Some ideas about how to grab the reader’s attention in the opening section (at least 2):
  • I am going to grab the readers attention by making the information interesting and relatable to them.
  • I am also going to grab their attention with the sound of my voice and images in my video essay. They will be able to hear the passion in my voice and want to hear more of what I have to say.
Some ideas about how to explain the larger significance of your subject in the closing section (at least 2):
  • I am going to talk about equality and why it is important as free Americans.
  • I am also going to talk about the next generation and why it is important to demand change and equal pay now.

Wednesday, March 30, 2016

Research Report

This blog post took me a very long time. However, it is very helpful when I am looking for information because I already have all of my sources and know that they are reliable.

Source #1

Title: U.S Women's Soccer Team Stars Allege Pay Discrimination
Authors: Joshua Robinson and Matthew Futterman
Source: http://www.wsj.com

Authors:
Audience:
Main Purpose:
Contextual Details:
  • This article is reliable because it includes evidence in the form of quotes.
  • It also gives statistics about how much less the women are getting paid compared to the men’s soccer team.
  • The article comes from a very well known and legitimate source, the Wall Street Journal.
Source #2
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/united-states-womens-soccer-equal-pay_us_56fd37e3e4b0daf53aeee5d7

Title: U.S. Women’s Soccer Doesn’t Deserve Equal Pay- They Deserve More
Author: Justin Block
Source: http://www.huffingtonpost.com

Author:
Audience: 
Main Purpose: 
Contextual Details:
  • This article is reliable because is comes from The Huffington Post.
  • It includes images to back up its information. Many of the images come directly from social media. 
  • The article also includes quotes and statistics as evidence. 
Source #3
http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2015/04/14/on-equal-pay-day-everything-you-need-to-know-about-the-gender-pay-gap/

Title: On Equal Pay Day, Key Facts About the Gender Pay Gap
Author: Eileen Patten
Source: http://www.pewresearch.org

Author:
Audience:
Main Purpose:
Contextual Details:
  • This article is reliable because it comes from Pew Research Center, therefor there has been a good amount of research conducted to find the statistics. 
  • This article also includes images, tables, and a video as support. 
Source #4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IDXuIHe0O2Q

Title: U.S. Women’s Soccer Team: It’s our ‘Responsibility’’To Push for Equal Pay’ | TODAY
Author: TODAY interviewer, Matt Lauer, interviewing Carli Lloyd, Becky Sauerbrunn, Hope Solo, Alex Morgan, and their attorney Jeffrey Kessler.
Source: TODAYNBC
https://www.youtube.com/user/TODAYNBC

Author:
Audience: 
  • The TODAY show is a daily live broadcast of current news in the U.S. and around the world. Their shows include weather reports and interviews with newsmakers from the worlds of politics, business, media, entertainment, and sports
  • Their audience targets individuals who are interested in those things and want to be more informed. 
  • http://www.today.com
Main Purpose:
  • The main purpose of the video is to provide primary evidence of what is going on with women’s soccer filing for equal pay. 
  • It wants viewers to hear it from the five girls filing the report themselves. 
  • Their lawyer is also included in the interview to give facts and statistics. 
  • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IDXuIHe0O2Q
Contextual Details:
  • The interview is a well known individual who is on the also well known TODAY show.
  • The video starts off with facts about the women’s soccer team, then goes into the interview with four girls filing the complaint about equal pay. 
  • You are able to hear the story from their side. 
Source #5
http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2016/03/31/472522790/members-of-u-s-women-s-national-team-file-federal-equal-pay-complaint

Title: U.S. Women’s Soccer Team Members File Federal Equal-Pay Complaint
Author: Bill Chappell
Source: http://www.npr.org

Author:
  • Bill Chappell is a writer and producer who currently works on The Two Way, NPR's flagship news portal.
  • Before joining CNN, Chappell wrote about movies, restaurants and music for alternative weeklies, in addition to his first job: editing the police blotter.
  • Source: http://www.npr.org/people/14562108/bill-chappell
Audience:
Main Purpose:
Contextual Details:
  • The article includes images, quotes, and statistics, making it a reliable source. 
  • It comes from a well known news cite that includes news from all over the United States.
Source #6
http://thinkprogress.org/sports/2016/03/31/3765191/womens-soccer-demands-equal-pay/

Title: The Best Soccer Team in America is Fed up with Second-Rate Pay
Author: Lindsay Gibbs
Source: http://thinkprogress.org

Author:
  • Lindsay Gibbs attended NYU’s Tisch School of the Arts where she studied film and television production.
  • Her writing has appeared in VICE Sports, USA Today, Tennis Magazine, Tennis.com, The Cauldron, FanSided, and The Classical.
  • Source: http://thinkprogress.org/person/lgibbs/
Audience: 
  • The audience for this article is those interested in women’s rights. 
  • The article comes from the website Think Progress. Think Progress is an American political news blog. 
  • http://thinkprogress.org
Main Purpose:
Contextual Details:
  • The article includes screenshots of tweets from Twitter to support its information and connect with the audience. 
  • It also includes quotes, statistics, and images.
  • This article is also reliable because it comes from a legitimate source.
Source #7
http://www.si.com/planet-futbol/2016/03/31/uswnt-eeoc-wage-discrimination-equal-pay

Title: USWNT Stars Accuse U.S. Soccer of Wage Discrimination in EEOC Filing
Author: Grant Wahl
Source: http://www.si.com

Author:
Audience:
Main Purpose:
Contextual Details:
  • The article is reliable because it comes from Sports Illustrated. 
  • It includes a table comparing how much money the men make versus how much money the women make on the national soccer teams. 
Source #8
http://thefederalist.com/2015/07/09/womens-soccer-doesnt-deserve-equal-pay/

Title: Woman’s Soccer Doesn’t Deserve Equal Pay
Author: Denise C. McAllister
Source: http://thefederalist.com

Author:
  • Denise graduated from the UNC Chapel Hill School of Journalism and has worked in both print and television news as an associate producer for the morning show at WFTV Orlando. 
  • In addition to being a writer, she is also an Expressionist artist and musician.
  • Source: http://thefederalist.com/author/d-c-mcallister/
Audience:
Main Purpose:
Contextual Details:
  • The author of this article includes counter arguments so she is able to disagree with them and explain why they are wrong.
  • She also includes quotes, statistics, subheadings and images in her article.
  • The articles comes from The Federalist which is a reliable source.
Source #9
http://www.eeoc.gov/laws/types/equalcompensation.cfm

Title: U.S Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Author: Federal Agency
Source: http://www.eeoc.gov

Author:
  • Federal laws prohibiting discrimination or regulating workplace issues are laws enforced by the EEOC.
  • EEOC follows a Compliance Manual and Enforcement Guidelines.
  • Source: http://www.eeoc.gov/laws/index.cfm
Audience: 
  • The audience of this website page are individuals interested in the law. 
  • This website is the official website for U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, so its audience are people looking for the straight facts, not opinions.
  • http://www.eeoc.gov/laws/types/equalcompensation.cfm
Main Purpose:
Contextual Details:
  • The information is reliable because it comes directly from the government on a government run website. 
  • It explains the different kinds of sex and equal pay discriminations.

Source #10
http://www.cnn.com/2016/04/01/football/uswnt-lawsuit-pay-parity/index.html?eref=rss_latest

Title: New Goal: U.S. Women’s Soccer Eyes Equal Pay
Author: Euan McKirdy
Source: http://www.cnn.com

Author:
Audience: 
Main Purpose:
Contextual Details:
  • This article comes from CNN which is a very reliable and well known source.
  • The article also includes a video, quotes, images, statistics, and story highlights. 

Tuesday, March 29, 2016

Rhetorical Analysis of Project 3

This blog post helped me decide what my argument should be about. It also helped me think about my audience and any counter-arguments I will encounter. It was a good way to start researching and planning project 3.

Author:

  1. How will you draw on any or some of the following for Project 3? Be specific about how your plans for Project 3 connect to some previous, current or burgeoning interest of your own, such as...


  • your own general research interests.
    Since we will be working on this project for four weeks, it is important that the argument I choose is interesting to me. I need to be passionate enough about the subject to want to inform others of this controversy/ argument. It is also important that I am interested in all of the research I will be conducting to gather all of my information. 



  • your major(s) and/or minor(s) here at the University of Arizona.
    I am currently a dance major along with communications major. I have been dancing ever since the age of three and am very passionate about anything related to dance. I would be very interested in all of the research for this project.

  • other subjects of interest you have encountered here or elsewhere in your recent studies.
    I have many other interests that I could use for this project. For example, I am very passionate about animals and have recently become a vegetarian. Researching something I am interested in will make this project more fun. 
  • your academic and/or professional goals.
    It will be very beneficial for my future if I conduct research about what profession I want to be in when I am older. I will be more motivated to do research and it will be more interesting to me. 



  • current-day social, cultural or political issues that you follow and are interested in.
    I am interested in social media and how it is effecting society. I am also interested in the environment, equal rights, and many other topics that I could use for my argument. 



  • subjects of personal interest or study, for instance:
    • hobbies such as hiking & climbing, gaming/programming, following sports or movies or music, etc.
      I am interested in dance, music, social life and communication, the outdoors, and the arts. Any of these subjects I would enjoy doing research and learning more about. 



    • skills you have committed yourself to acquiring like dedication to a sport, an instrument, a practice such as yoga or meditation, etc.
      I am very dedicated to dance and the arts. I would be very passionate talking about this subject.


    • subjects you’ve read about previously in science or history or literature, etc.
      I am currently in a nutrition class that is very interesting to me. I also enjoy reading about the arts, dance, gay marriage, and anything about the self being. 



2. What are the preconceptions, previously held opinions and/or potential areas for personal  
bias that you should be aware of for Project 3? What about any of the

      following?:

    • Your family of origin, and the spoken or unspoken set(s) of “family values” that come with belonging to that family.

      My family is very respectful. However, I was taught and raised to stand up for what I believe in.

    • The social class of yourself/your family (consider honestly your family’s level of access to wealth, real estate, travel, leisure, luxury items, etc.).

      My family would be considered middle class.” We are not very wealthy and have to be smart with our money, but we do not struggle to eat or survive. Therefor, I consider myself very lucky live the way I do.

    • The location/geography where you were raised, and whatever local norms, customs, attitudes, traditions, and/or prejudices come with belonging or not belonging.

      My parents lived in Illinois their whole lives. However, I was born and raised in a suburb in southern California. Living an hour away from LA has allowed me to grow up in a suburb with a city close by so I get to experience urban areas as well.

    • The religious and/or spiritual tradition you were raised in, and whatever beliefs, values, worldviews and/or prejudices come with belonging or not belonging.

      Growing up, my family attended Catholic Church. That is the religion I grew up with. However, I do not agree with everything the church stresses, such as being against gay marriage. My parents are open to me following my own beliefs and values.

    • The political beliefs of the family, community, area/region or state in which you were raised, and whatever attitudes, beliefs, traditions, values and/or prejudices come with belonging or not belonging.

      My parents are conservatives and that has definitely rubbed off on me. I would consider myself more of an independent because I agree with some aspects of both political parties.

Audience:

Based on your plans for Project 3, answer the following…
  1. How are you thinking about your audience for this project? Who are you going to make this for? Describe them.

    My audience is people who have similar beliefs as me, especially on the subject of animal cruelty and using animals to test products. My goal is to convince and inform people why animal testing for products is bad. 

  2. What beliefs and assumptions might this audience already hold? What position are they likely to take on this issue? How will you respond to that position?

    Whoever watches my video essay will probably already have an opinion about the argument. However, hopefully after they watch my video I will affect that opinion, if they are for animal testing and make them rethink things.

  3. How might they react to your argument?

    They will most likely react with counter arguments defending their beliefs.

  4. How are you going to relate to or connect with your audience? Are there any specific words, ideas or ways of arguing that will help you relate to them in this way?

    I am going to use rhetorical strategies to connect with my audience. I am going to play with their emotions, use logos to support my statements, and provide credibility for myself and where all of my information came from.

  5. Think of one specific person or a set of people you know personally or professionally who fall within the definition of ‘target audience’ you’re using for Project 3. What could you tell them or say to them in order to convince them of your perspective? What would need to happen for them to agree with you?

My "target audience” would be any individuals, businesses, or lawmakers who disagree
with my view about animal cruelty, especially the people who are making money from  
it.

Purpose/Message.
  1. What do you want to accomplish with Project 3? What affect do you want it to have on your intended audience? For instance:
    • What might you want your audience to do after reading/watching/listening to my project?

      I want them to personally want to advocate for animal rights and think about which products and companies they support/ buy from.

    • What might you want your audience to consider after reading/watching/ listening to your project?

      I want my audience to consider the animals and how they are being treated. I also want them to consider boycotting certain companies who use animals to test their products.

    • What might you want your audience to believe after reading/watching/ listening to your project?

      I want my audience to believe that animal cruelty and testing is bad and that there is a way to test products and make sure they are safe without hurting animals.

      2.    Now that you’ve done all your research and figured out what you think about the
             controversy you’ve chosen, what still needs to be accomplished? For instance:
    • Is there anything that still needs to be explained or pointed out to the people talking about this issue?
      Not that I have found from the research I have done.

    • Is there anything that the people arguing about this need to be reminded of or made aware of?

      People need to remember that animals are alive and can feel pain as well.

    • Are there any perspectives on the issue that still need to be expressed?
      What other options are there besides testing on animals.

    • Are there any persons who we still need to hear from?
      There are many organizations, such as PETA, and other individuals who are passionate about this subject and have a lot to say about it. 

       Is there any information that we still need to gather?

      Yes, I still need to research all of the statistics regarding animal testing.  

Context. What are the particular circumstances surrounding this assignment?

  • We need to make an argument about a current public controversy that is of interest to us by using rhetorical situations and strategies.
What genre?
  1. What course genre will you be writing in for Project 3?

    video essay

  2. What kinds of audience expectations come along with this genre, generally?

    The audience expects good visuals and sounds and an engaging voice that captivates them.

  3. What is your history working in the genre you have selected for Project 3?

    I have no experience making video essays.

  4. Describe your comfort level and general feelings about the genre. How will they affect your work on Project 3?

    I am very nervous about making a video essay. I am unfamiliar with the genre and have heard scary things about it from my peers. Not being confident about the genre could affect how my work turns out.

5. What are the two most effective conventions in this genre, in your opinion? Why? Be 
specific.
The two most effective conventions of video essays are a capturing and interesting voice,  
and visuals. Those are the only two senses being stimulated and therefor should be  
interesting, pleasing, and intriguing.

When?
  1. Are there any historical events that might impact how your audience perceives your argument or the kind of background information or evidence you need to include? For instance, does media reporting on any of the following involve your issue/subject for Project 3?:
    • The approval or rejections of laws and/or budgets by the Executive branch of the U.S. government.

      Yes, the Executive branch of the government could approve or reject laws relating to animal testing.

    • Cabinet appointments and removals made by the Executive branch of the U.S. government.

      This could affect the voting of certain laws related to my argument.

    • The authorization or funding of military hostilities by the Executive branch of the U.S. government.

      This does not affect my argument.

    • The writing of, discussion about and voting on laws and/or budgets in the Legislative branch of the U.S. government.

      I should include any laws related to animal testing in my project.

    • The explanations made for legal decisions in the Judicial branch of the U.S. government.

      Anything related to laws and animal cruelty should be included in my project.

       3.    What are the three or four major counter-arguments you’ll have to respond to, based upon what people are saying in the press/media? Be specific and cite your sources using working hyperlinks.
  • Animals are very important for medical research to help cure diseases.
  • It is better than testing on humans. 


  • "We share 95% of our genes with a mouse, making them an effective model for the human body."